![]() 05/10/2018 at 17:46 • Filed to: Merkool | ![]() | ![]() |
I remember the XR4Ti as being a pretty cool car. That bubble was burst today when I saw one for the first time in years- what a piece of dung! Were the 80’s so bad that this passed for a cool car?!
The owner does get bonus points for the plate if you care to zoom in.
Let’s have a poll! What is your nostalgic guilty 80’s pleasure that is actually a tremendous let-down in real life?
Bon Jovi? Kung Fu? Bill Cosby?
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:05 |
|
No, they were ugly in the 80s, too.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:11 |
|
And usually broken..
They were like the SVX - the only time you ever saw one there would be two or three others in pieces parked in the yard..
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:12 |
|
Might be odd looking but if you had a maintained and unmolested example of this model it would be worth a fair sum.
Note the different body.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:13 |
|
Indiana Jones.
Loved those movies when I was a kid. Watched them as an adult the other day and even hammered it was pretty bad...
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:16 |
|
Now now, The Last Crusade certainly holds up. Just watched it the other day. The first one is still important, the second one can rot in hell, and the fourth one is somewhat watchable but....Shia la Beef.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:30 |
|
What if I find a Tempo and slap a wing on it?
Cost of wing $200
Tempo - someone would pay me to take it away
= profit
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:31 |
|
Maybe they alternate like Star Trek movies and the next one will be great!
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:32 |
|
All you need then is a Cosworth engine....
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:34 |
|
I was in tech school some one in my class had one. I thought it was a rad little car. I’d still drive one if I found a clean Turbo for a good price. But awkward 80s designs in general are my guilty pleasure. Like this and the 77-82 Celica.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:35 |
|
Yeah the first one’s sins were mostly forgivable... though I’m not sure how he rode a submarine onto that island. Or was that Bond? Or both?
Second was, indeed, garbage.
Third at least seemed to not be taking itself seriously even a little bit, but it asked the audience to take a lot for granted... I just wasn’t super impressed.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:39 |
|
The alloys wheels are awful but is that black duct or electrical tape on the B pillars? Just no man, no.
It looks so different to what I grew up with in the U.K.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:40 |
|
The submarine was the first one, and no, it’s never been fully explained. However, it is true that diesel-electric subs of that era spent probably 95% of their time on the surface, charging the batteries and getting fresh air to the crew. They also made much better time on the surface.
I think the best part of the third film was the chemistry between Ford and Connery. But I’ve not seen many Connery films that I didn’t enjoy. Except for Zardoz . If you’ve never seen it, you should watch The Hill .
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:53 |
|
Holy crap! I saw one of these today.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 18:55 |
|
Ah. That’s a problem.
I do love some of the bonkers big-turbo 4 cylinders from the 80’s. Press pedal- wait - wait- Whooosh!!!!!
![]() 05/10/2018 at 19:22 |
|
You’d be right if the Sierra RS500 didn’t have this:
and if it didn’t have touring car racing credentials as such:
![]() 05/10/2018 at 20:44 |
|
all of those squarebody cars from the 80s that didnt have much power.....
![]() 05/10/2018 at 21:13 |
|
If you wanted a cool FoMoCo 80's ride with a 4-banger turbo there were better options:
![]() 05/10/2018 at 21:47 |
|
The ‘87-88 T-birds have aged well I think. Now I’m dreaming of one with an EcoBoost.... Just 80’s enough to be totally rad.
![]() 05/10/2018 at 23:14 |
|
Wrong.
Full disclosure: My dream car is a Buick Grand National. I’ll never own one or touch one because I know how awful ‘80s GM was, and the illusion would immediately disappear.
![]() 05/11/2018 at 03:32 |
|
Except for Zardoz .
I had to google that. And, after just a single screen shot, watch it. Thanks!
![]() 05/11/2018 at 05:27 |
|
And RWD...
![]() 05/11/2018 at 09:33 |
|
It’s a damned crazy film. It was directed by John Boorman, who was given a big budget and pretty much free rein by the studio because he had just done Deliverance , which was a huge hit. He did not disappoint and, in many ways, it’s more Boorman than Deliverance .
![]() 05/11/2018 at 10:19 |
|
So I did just watch it and it was... so bad it was actually good. I did enjoy myself. It’s very clearly a film that could only be made in the late 60s and early to mid 70s though, even ignoring the special effects.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Deliverance. I’ll put it on the list.
Perspective disclaimer: this movie is 9 years older than I am.
![]() 05/11/2018 at 10:26 |
|
I love movies that act as time capsules, even if they depict a dystopian future. The original Planet of the Apes or Logan’s Run are other examples of this idea. The first time I saw Zardoz was in a midnight showing at a local theater back in the 80s. Let’s just say my mind was suitable altered, but that didn’t help the understanding one bit. But I did fall in love with Charlotte Rampling.
![]() 05/11/2018 at 11:21 |
|
I love movies that act as time capsules, even if they depict a dystopian future.
I love those too. I just like watching movies from the 60-70s for that reason. 80s too, but they are (in my mind) not as ‘classic’ just yet. To me, like to many others I guess, the cutoff age is probably about the year I was born.
Agreed about your last sentence!